https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469631 The writ court declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction where the challenge to notices demanding electricity duty turned on disputed facts about the nature of supply and the transaction with the Electricity Board, including whether return-filing and duty-liability provisions applied. Because those issues required factual enquiry and a statutory appeal was available under the Bihar State Electricity Act, 1948, the petition was not entertained and the petitioner was left to pursue the appellate remedy. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:41:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469631 The writ court declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction where the challenge to notices demanding electricity duty turned on disputed facts about the nature of supply and the transaction with the Electricity Board, including whether return-filing and duty-liability provisions applied. Because those issues required factual enquiry and a statutory appeal was available under the Bihar State Electricity Act, 1948, the petition was not entertained and the petitioner was left to pursue the appellate remedy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469631