https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793842 Writ interference in SARFAESI recovery proceedings is ordinarily barred where the statute provides an effective remedy before the DRT, and it is confined to exceptional cases such as statutory violation, fundamental procedural irregularity, use of repealed provisions, or breach of natural justice. The challenge here turned on disputed facts about whether the sale deeds were nominal and the mortgage was fraudulent, but those contentions did not establish any exceptional ground for Article 226 intervention. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, and the Single Judge's dismissal required no interference. en-us Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793842 Writ interference in SARFAESI recovery proceedings is ordinarily barred where the statute provides an effective remedy before the DRT, and it is confined to exceptional cases such as statutory violation, fundamental procedural irregularity, use of repealed provisions, or breach of natural justice. The challenge here turned on disputed facts about whether the sale deeds were nominal and the mortgage was fraudulent, but those contentions did not establish any exceptional ground for Article 226 intervention. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, and the Single Judge's dismissal required no interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793842