<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1224 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793843</link>
    <description>Section 34(8A) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 could be invoked only during pending proceedings, and the prescribed authority had to record satisfaction that tax had been evaded or incorrectly disclosed on the basis of search material. Because no proceedings were pending when the notices were issued and the notices did not record the required satisfaction, the notices lacked jurisdiction and were liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1224 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793843</link>
      <description>Section 34(8A) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 could be invoked only during pending proceedings, and the prescribed authority had to record satisfaction that tax had been evaded or incorrectly disclosed on the basis of search material. Because no proceedings were pending when the notices were issued and the notices did not record the required satisfaction, the notices lacked jurisdiction and were liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>