<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1232 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793851</link>
    <description>Construction of a covering over an auction platform at a Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti was not exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST because the platform remained part of commercial auction activity; the demand was upheld. Roads within the mandi were treated as roads meant for use by the general public, so the exemption applied and the demand was set aside for that service. Works relating to covering of auction platforms, boundary walls, check posts and the approach road up to the gate were not covered by the exemption for post-harvest storage infrastructure, as market structures are not storage infrastructure; the demand was upheld. Non-registration, non-filing of returns and non-payment supported suppression, so the extended period and penalties were justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1232 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793851</link>
      <description>Construction of a covering over an auction platform at a Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti was not exempt under Notification No. 25/2012-ST because the platform remained part of commercial auction activity; the demand was upheld. Roads within the mandi were treated as roads meant for use by the general public, so the exemption applied and the demand was set aside for that service. Works relating to covering of auction platforms, boundary walls, check posts and the approach road up to the gate were not covered by the exemption for post-harvest storage infrastructure, as market structures are not storage infrastructure; the demand was upheld. Non-registration, non-filing of returns and non-payment supported suppression, so the extended period and penalties were justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>