<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1243 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793862</link>
    <description>Appeals that merely adopted the grounds of a connected appeal could not survive independently once the connected appeal had already been remanded and the impugned order against the importing noticee no longer subsisted. Personal penalties imposed on the appellants, being purely consequential to the demand and confiscation against the importing noticee, also could not stand after the underlying liability ceased to exist. The penalties were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1243 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793862</link>
      <description>Appeals that merely adopted the grounds of a connected appeal could not survive independently once the connected appeal had already been remanded and the impugned order against the importing noticee no longer subsisted. Personal penalties imposed on the appellants, being purely consequential to the demand and confiscation against the importing noticee, also could not stand after the underlying liability ceased to exist. The penalties were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>