<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1277 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793896</link>
    <description>A revisional order under section 263 was found unsustainable because the assessee was given only one day to respond to the show-cause notice, which the ITAT majority held was not a reasonable opportunity of hearing and breached the principles of natural justice under section 263(1). The defect did not invalidate the revision proceedings entirely; the proper course was to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the Principal Commissioner for fresh adjudication after granting adequate opportunity of hearing. The dissenting view differed on the merits and also favoured remand in light of deficiencies in the assessment and revisional process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 13:05:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1277 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793896</link>
      <description>A revisional order under section 263 was found unsustainable because the assessee was given only one day to respond to the show-cause notice, which the ITAT majority held was not a reasonable opportunity of hearing and breached the principles of natural justice under section 263(1). The defect did not invalidate the revision proceedings entirely; the proper course was to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the Principal Commissioner for fresh adjudication after granting adequate opportunity of hearing. The dissenting view differed on the merits and also favoured remand in light of deficiencies in the assessment and revisional process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>