https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793906 A writ challenge under the GST law was declined where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available and the dispute involved factual issues from departmental proceedings. The court held that interference under Article 226 was not warranted in such circumstances. Allegations of non-supply of the complete show cause notice and relied upon documents, and of breach of natural justice, also failed because the taxpayer had participated in the proceedings, filed replies, and received a personal hearing. The objection about incomplete notice was not raised earlier, and the alleged document reference error was treated as typographical. No ground was made out to quash the notice or the order in original. en-us Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793906 A writ challenge under the GST law was declined where an efficacious statutory appellate remedy was available and the dispute involved factual issues from departmental proceedings. The court held that interference under Article 226 was not warranted in such circumstances. Allegations of non-supply of the complete show cause notice and relied upon documents, and of breach of natural justice, also failed because the taxpayer had participated in the proceedings, filed replies, and received a personal hearing. The objection about incomplete notice was not raised earlier, and the alleged document reference error was treated as typographical. No ground was made out to quash the notice or the order in original. Case-Laws GST Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793906