<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1973 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469622</link>
    <description>Sundry creditors arising from credit purchases were treated as trade liabilities and not as cash credits for section 68 purposes where the books were not rejected and the corresponding purchases or business expenditure were not disbelieved. On those facts, the cash credit enquiry could not be applied in the same manner as for unexplained cash receipts, because the liability was already recorded in the books and linked to genuine business transactions. The addition under section 68 was therefore held unsustainable and deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1973 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469622</link>
      <description>Sundry creditors arising from credit purchases were treated as trade liabilities and not as cash credits for section 68 purposes where the books were not rejected and the corresponding purchases or business expenditure were not disbelieved. On those facts, the cash credit enquiry could not be applied in the same manner as for unexplained cash receipts, because the liability was already recorded in the books and linked to genuine business transactions. The addition under section 68 was therefore held unsustainable and deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>