<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1354 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469605</link>
    <description>In petrol and diesel stock accounts, evaporation or handling loss of up to 1% was treated as a reasonable norm, so only the excess over that level could justify an addition. The Tribunal relied on an earlier co-ordinate Bench view accepting 1% as normal in similar circumstances and found no reason to depart from that approach. On that basis, the restriction of the addition to the amount beyond 1% was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 10:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1354 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469605</link>
      <description>In petrol and diesel stock accounts, evaporation or handling loss of up to 1% was treated as a reasonable norm, so only the excess over that level could justify an addition. The Tribunal relied on an earlier co-ordinate Bench view accepting 1% as normal in similar circumstances and found no reason to depart from that approach. On that basis, the restriction of the addition to the amount beyond 1% was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>