<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1147 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793766</link>
    <description>Cheque dishonour appeals may be reconsidered for compounding and allied relief where the cheque amount has been substantially deposited and the drawer offers further payment. The text states that the Supreme Court&#039;s compounding guidelines, as modified, permit compounding on payment of 7.5% of the cheque amount even at the Sessions Court or High Court appellate stage, and that where the complainant does not consent, the court may consider a plea of guilt, the powers corresponding to Section 255(2) and Section 255(3) of the CrPC or Section 278 of the BNSS, and relief under the Probation of Offenders Act. Applying those principles, the impugned orders were quashed and the applications restored for fresh appellate consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1147 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793766</link>
      <description>Cheque dishonour appeals may be reconsidered for compounding and allied relief where the cheque amount has been substantially deposited and the drawer offers further payment. The text states that the Supreme Court&#039;s compounding guidelines, as modified, permit compounding on payment of 7.5% of the cheque amount even at the Sessions Court or High Court appellate stage, and that where the complainant does not consent, the court may consider a plea of guilt, the powers corresponding to Section 255(2) and Section 255(3) of the CrPC or Section 278 of the BNSS, and relief under the Probation of Offenders Act. Applying those principles, the impugned orders were quashed and the applications restored for fresh appellate consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>