<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1159 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793778</link>
    <description>Approval under section 80G cannot be denied merely because an institution has incidental religious objects or incurs religious expenditure, so long as it is not confined to a particular religious community or caste and its purposes are not wholly or substantially religious. The statute permits religious expenditure within the prescribed ceiling, and the assessee&#039;s dominant objects were educational, social and welfare in nature, with no material showing restricted benefit to any community. The rejection also relied on unverified internet material without confronting the assessee, offending natural justice. On these grounds, approval under section 80G was held to be sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1159 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793778</link>
      <description>Approval under section 80G cannot be denied merely because an institution has incidental religious objects or incurs religious expenditure, so long as it is not confined to a particular religious community or caste and its purposes are not wholly or substantially religious. The statute permits religious expenditure within the prescribed ceiling, and the assessee&#039;s dominant objects were educational, social and welfare in nature, with no material showing restricted benefit to any community. The rejection also relied on unverified internet material without confronting the assessee, offending natural justice. On these grounds, approval under section 80G was held to be sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>