<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1167 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793786</link>
    <description>Exemption under section 11 should not be denied in processing under section 143(1) merely because Form 10B was filed after the return, where the audit report was on record before the intimation was issued. The CPC had the report at the time of processing, so no prejudice was shown to the Revenue and denial solely for belated filing was unjustified. The intimation was therefore required to be amended by taking Form 10B into account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1167 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793786</link>
      <description>Exemption under section 11 should not be denied in processing under section 143(1) merely because Form 10B was filed after the return, where the audit report was on record before the intimation was issued. The CPC had the report at the time of processing, so no prejudice was shown to the Revenue and denial solely for belated filing was unjustified. The intimation was therefore required to be amended by taking Form 10B into account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>