<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 155 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52363</link>
    <description>Duty on waste and scrap under Rule 57S(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is sustainable only where the Revenue proves by evidence that the scrap actually arose from capital goods on which Modvat credit was taken. The record contained no material linking the scrap to such machinery, and the Finance Manager&#039;s answer did not establish that connection. The finding below was therefore unsupported by evidence, the duty demand could not stand, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 155 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52363</link>
      <description>Duty on waste and scrap under Rule 57S(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is sustainable only where the Revenue proves by evidence that the scrap actually arose from capital goods on which Modvat credit was taken. The record contained no material linking the scrap to such machinery, and the Finance Manager&#039;s answer did not establish that connection. The finding below was therefore unsupported by evidence, the duty demand could not stand, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>