<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1183 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793802</link>
    <description>Where the difference between sale consideration and stamp duty value is within the permissible tolerance range, no addition is justified under section 56(2)(vii)(b), and the Tribunal deleted the addition for the assessee. A deduction under section 80C cannot be allowed if it was not claimed in the return of income, because section 80A(5) statutorily bars such allowance; the disallowance was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1183 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793802</link>
      <description>Where the difference between sale consideration and stamp duty value is within the permissible tolerance range, no addition is justified under section 56(2)(vii)(b), and the Tribunal deleted the addition for the assessee. A deduction under section 80C cannot be allowed if it was not claimed in the return of income, because section 80A(5) statutorily bars such allowance; the disallowance was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>