<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1187 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793806</link>
    <description>Where immovable property is booked under an earlier allotment letter and consideration is paid through banking channels before the registered agreement, the first proviso to section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) requires stamp duty value to be taken on the agreement or allotment date, not the later registration date. The appellate record also noted that valuation material and ready reckoner value for the earlier year were relevant to determine the correct statutory comparison, so additional evidence was admitted for proper adjudication. The Assessing Officer was directed to verify the authenticity and correctness of those documents, and the addition based on the registration-date value was sent back for fresh examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1187 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793806</link>
      <description>Where immovable property is booked under an earlier allotment letter and consideration is paid through banking channels before the registered agreement, the first proviso to section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) requires stamp duty value to be taken on the agreement or allotment date, not the later registration date. The appellate record also noted that valuation material and ready reckoner value for the earlier year were relevant to determine the correct statutory comparison, so additional evidence was admitted for proper adjudication. The Assessing Officer was directed to verify the authenticity and correctness of those documents, and the addition based on the registration-date value was sent back for fresh examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>