https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52360 A customs house agent licence was found liable to revocation because the licence had been sublet for monetary consideration and client authorisation letters had not been obtained, amounting to violations of Regulations 13 and 14 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984. The revocation was therefore justified on the regulatory breaches. However, the period of revocation was curtailed because the CHA had already remained out of business since suspension, and that loss of business was treated as sufficient punishment. The licence was ordered to be restored from 1-1-2004. en-us Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:34:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52360 A customs house agent licence was found liable to revocation because the licence had been sublet for monetary consideration and client authorisation letters had not been obtained, amounting to violations of Regulations 13 and 14 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984. The revocation was therefore justified on the regulatory breaches. However, the period of revocation was curtailed because the CHA had already remained out of business since suspension, and that loss of business was treated as sufficient punishment. The licence was ordered to be restored from 1-1-2004. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52360