https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793820 Petitioners sought reimbursement in writ proceedings of GST allegedly paid on works contracts entered into before the GST regime. The HC held that the claim was contractual in nature and turned on disputed questions of fact, so it was not fit for adjudication in writ jurisdiction. The court therefore declined to examine the reimbursement claim on the facts pleaded and dismissed the petition. en-us Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:08:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793820 Petitioners sought reimbursement in writ proceedings of GST allegedly paid on works contracts entered into before the GST regime. The HC held that the claim was contractual in nature and turned on disputed questions of fact, so it was not fit for adjudication in writ jurisdiction. The court therefore declined to examine the reimbursement claim on the facts pleaded and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws GST Fri, 12 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793820