<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1834 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469587</link>
    <description>Section 482 CrPC remains available even after a criminal case has reached the evidence stage, because the power to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice is not lost before judgment; the objection that the petition had become infructuous was rejected. Where the same allegations had already led to exoneration on merits in departmental proceedings, and that exoneration had become final, continuation of a criminal prosecution on identical facts was treated as futile, inherently improbable, and an abuse of process. On that basis, the criminal proceeding was liable to be quashed and the petitioner was entitled to discharge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 19:00:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1834 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469587</link>
      <description>Section 482 CrPC remains available even after a criminal case has reached the evidence stage, because the power to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice is not lost before judgment; the objection that the petition had become infructuous was rejected. Where the same allegations had already led to exoneration on merits in departmental proceedings, and that exoneration had become final, continuation of a criminal prosecution on identical facts was treated as futile, inherently improbable, and an abuse of process. On that basis, the criminal proceeding was liable to be quashed and the petitioner was entitled to discharge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>