<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1530 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469585</link>
    <description>Amortisation of goodwill was treated as a non-operating, extraordinary item and excluded from operating expenses for transfer pricing margin computation, because it did not affect ordinary day-to-day business operations. Working capital adjustment was upheld where material differences between the assessee and comparables could distort profitability, with Rule 10B(3) applied to require reasonably accurate adjustments. Depreciation on a non-compete fee was held allowable because the payment created a capital business right amounting to an intangible asset of a commercial nature. On all substantive issues, the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:46:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1530 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469585</link>
      <description>Amortisation of goodwill was treated as a non-operating, extraordinary item and excluded from operating expenses for transfer pricing margin computation, because it did not affect ordinary day-to-day business operations. Working capital adjustment was upheld where material differences between the assessee and comparables could distort profitability, with Rule 10B(3) applied to require reasonably accurate adjustments. Depreciation on a non-compete fee was held allowable because the payment created a capital business right amounting to an intangible asset of a commercial nature. On all substantive issues, the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>