<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 143 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52351</link>
    <description>Iron and steel scrap generated during factory construction was not liable to central excise duty where no Modvat credit had been taken on the duty-paid steel material used. Liability on such waste and scrap depended on prior availment of credit as input or capital goods, and in the absence of any evidence or finding that credit had been claimed, mere generation of scrap during construction did not attract duty. The demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 143 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52351</link>
      <description>Iron and steel scrap generated during factory construction was not liable to central excise duty where no Modvat credit had been taken on the duty-paid steel material used. Liability on such waste and scrap depended on prior availment of credit as input or capital goods, and in the absence of any evidence or finding that credit had been claimed, mere generation of scrap during construction did not attract duty. The demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>