<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 148 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52346</link>
    <description>Duty could not be demanded for sugar allegedly removed from records after a fire where the assessee promptly reported the loss and independent enquiry found no solid evidence of clandestine removal. The SDM&#039;s report supported the conclusion that fire could not be ruled out, while the department produced no reliable contrary proof and relied mainly on a disputed surveyor&#039;s report. On those facts, the claim for remission of duty on goods destroyed in fire was satisfied, so the duty demand was unsustainable and the penalty also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 148 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52346</link>
      <description>Duty could not be demanded for sugar allegedly removed from records after a fire where the assessee promptly reported the loss and independent enquiry found no solid evidence of clandestine removal. The SDM&#039;s report supported the conclusion that fire could not be ruled out, while the department produced no reliable contrary proof and relied mainly on a disputed surveyor&#039;s report. On those facts, the claim for remission of duty on goods destroyed in fire was satisfied, so the duty demand was unsustainable and the penalty also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>