<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1112 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793731</link>
    <description>DSIR-certified in-house R&amp;D deduction under section 35(2AB) cannot be rejected by tax authorities merely on the basis of survey statements, as the prescribed authority&#039;s quantified certification prevails. A further corporate-tax disallowance of the same expenditure, after transfer pricing examination, is treated as an impermissible second-level disallowance under sections 40A(2)(b) and 37. Claims for litigation provision, short TDS credit, and Chapter VI-A relief required verification on the assessment record. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was consequential, and penalty proceedings under section 274 read with sections 271(1)(c) and 271AA were premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 11:13:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1112 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793731</link>
      <description>DSIR-certified in-house R&amp;D deduction under section 35(2AB) cannot be rejected by tax authorities merely on the basis of survey statements, as the prescribed authority&#039;s quantified certification prevails. A further corporate-tax disallowance of the same expenditure, after transfer pricing examination, is treated as an impermissible second-level disallowance under sections 40A(2)(b) and 37. Claims for litigation provision, short TDS credit, and Chapter VI-A relief required verification on the assessment record. Interest under sections 234B and 234C was consequential, and penalty proceedings under section 274 read with sections 271(1)(c) and 271AA were premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>