<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1123 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793742</link>
    <description>The note consolidates settled ITAT and jurisdictional precedent on banking-tax issues: deduction under section 36(1)(viia) read with Rule 6ABA, notional gains on foreign exchange forward revaluation, CSR and trust-related outgo under section 37(1), 60% depreciation on ATMs, section 14A read with Rule 8D, depreciation on HTM/HFT/AFS securities, section 36(1)(viii) special reserve computation, timing of tax on interest on securities, and inapplicability of section 115JB to banking companies. It emphasises that, where identical issues in the assessee&#039;s own case are already covered by binding precedent and no distinguishing facts or contrary authority are shown, the same view governs and the Revenue&#039;s objections fail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1123 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793742</link>
      <description>The note consolidates settled ITAT and jurisdictional precedent on banking-tax issues: deduction under section 36(1)(viia) read with Rule 6ABA, notional gains on foreign exchange forward revaluation, CSR and trust-related outgo under section 37(1), 60% depreciation on ATMs, section 14A read with Rule 8D, depreciation on HTM/HFT/AFS securities, section 36(1)(viii) special reserve computation, timing of tax on interest on securities, and inapplicability of section 115JB to banking companies. It emphasises that, where identical issues in the assessee&#039;s own case are already covered by binding precedent and no distinguishing facts or contrary authority are shown, the same view governs and the Revenue&#039;s objections fail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>