<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1138 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793757</link>
    <description>A charitable trust&#039;s excess application of income in earlier years was treated as adjustable against income of a later year on commercial principles, and such adjustment was regarded as application of income in the year of set-off under section 11. The absence of a specific carry-forward claim in the earlier year&#039;s return did not, by itself, defeat the claim. Explanation 5 to section 11(1) was treated as prospective and not applicable to AY 2017-18. Because the factual availability and quantification of the adjustment required verification from the trust&#039;s books, the matter was restored to the AO for limited examination and consequential allowance if the claim was correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1138 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793757</link>
      <description>A charitable trust&#039;s excess application of income in earlier years was treated as adjustable against income of a later year on commercial principles, and such adjustment was regarded as application of income in the year of set-off under section 11. The absence of a specific carry-forward claim in the earlier year&#039;s return did not, by itself, defeat the claim. Explanation 5 to section 11(1) was treated as prospective and not applicable to AY 2017-18. Because the factual availability and quantification of the adjustment required verification from the trust&#039;s books, the matter was restored to the AO for limited examination and consequential allowance if the claim was correct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>