<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1139 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793758</link>
    <description>Payments for automated Google AdWords advertising were treated as advertising charges under section 194C, not fees for technical services under section 194J, because the arrangement involved use of an online platform for placing advertisements and there was no proved managerial, technical or consultancy service, or human intervention, rendered to the payer. The specific provision for advertising prevailed over the general technical-services provision. On that basis, tax was correctly deducted at the lower rate applicable under section 194C, and the treatment of the assessee as in default for short deduction, together with interest, was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1139 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793758</link>
      <description>Payments for automated Google AdWords advertising were treated as advertising charges under section 194C, not fees for technical services under section 194J, because the arrangement involved use of an online platform for placing advertisements and there was no proved managerial, technical or consultancy service, or human intervention, rendered to the payer. The specific provision for advertising prevailed over the general technical-services provision. On that basis, tax was correctly deducted at the lower rate applicable under section 194C, and the treatment of the assessee as in default for short deduction, together with interest, was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>