<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fair market value under section 50C must reflect existing property condition, not hypothetical development, and statutory valuation steps must be followed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101027</link>
    <description>Under section 50C, fair market value must be determined on the property&#039;s existing condition, not on a hypothetical development or plotting basis. The text states that where the difference between declared consideration and the valuation was within the accepted tolerance band, the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s report could not reliably replace the actual sale price, especially because it assumed future development, deducted development expenses and developer&#039;s profit, and did not value the land as transferred. It also notes that, after a reference under section 50C(2), appellate direction to adopt stamp duty value directly was contrary to the statutory mechanism and unsustainable. The addition to long-term capital gains was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Fair market value under section 50C must reflect existing property condition, not hypothetical development, and statutory valuation steps must be followed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101027</link>
      <description>Under section 50C, fair market value must be determined on the property&#039;s existing condition, not on a hypothetical development or plotting basis. The text states that where the difference between declared consideration and the valuation was within the accepted tolerance band, the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s report could not reliably replace the actual sale price, especially because it assumed future development, deducted development expenses and developer&#039;s profit, and did not value the land as transferred. It also notes that, after a reference under section 50C(2), appellate direction to adopt stamp duty value directly was contrary to the statutory mechanism and unsustainable. The addition to long-term capital gains was deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>