<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DSIR-approved R&amp;D deduction and APA-aligned transfer pricing adjustments were limited, while double disallowance was rejected.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101017</link>
    <description>DSIR-approved in-house R&amp;D deduction cannot be disallowed by the AO or DRP on the basis of survey statements once the prescribed authority has quantified the eligible expenditure; later survey findings do not unsettle earlier certified claims. Where procurement commission had already been benchmarked in transfer pricing proceedings, a further disallowance under the normal provisions was treated as impermissible double disallowance, absent evidence that the payment was sham. On APA-consistent transactions, the raw material purchase adjustment was restricted and the corporate guarantee adjustment was deleted or capped. Litigation provision, Chapter VI-A deduction and TDS credit issues were remitted for verification, with interest consequential and penalty premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DSIR-approved R&amp;D deduction and APA-aligned transfer pricing adjustments were limited, while double disallowance was rejected.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101017</link>
      <description>DSIR-approved in-house R&amp;D deduction cannot be disallowed by the AO or DRP on the basis of survey statements once the prescribed authority has quantified the eligible expenditure; later survey findings do not unsettle earlier certified claims. Where procurement commission had already been benchmarked in transfer pricing proceedings, a further disallowance under the normal provisions was treated as impermissible double disallowance, absent evidence that the payment was sham. On APA-consistent transactions, the raw material purchase adjustment was restricted and the corporate guarantee adjustment was deleted or capped. Litigation provision, Chapter VI-A deduction and TDS credit issues were remitted for verification, with interest consequential and penalty premature.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 08:08:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>