https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469564 Commission earned by a distributor under Business Auxiliary Service was not finally determined on merits; following an earlier co-ordinate Tribunal decision on an identical issue, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication. The Tribunal held that the adjudicating authority must reconsider the demand in accordance with the earlier remand direction, rather than apply a fresh substantive determination in this appeal. en-us Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jun 2026 12:54:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469564 Commission earned by a distributor under Business Auxiliary Service was not finally determined on merits; following an earlier co-ordinate Tribunal decision on an identical issue, the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo adjudication. The Tribunal held that the adjudicating authority must reconsider the demand in accordance with the earlier remand direction, rather than apply a fresh substantive determination in this appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469564