<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1874 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469556</link>
    <description>The article concerns whether franchise fees paid to secure the right to participate in the Indian Premier League should be treated as revenue expenditure. It records that the ITAT had held the expenditure to be revenue in nature, and the Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on the framed substantial question of law. The operative point is the tax characterization of the franchise-fee outlay, with the issue left for appellate determination on the stated legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 16:53:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1874 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469556</link>
      <description>The article concerns whether franchise fees paid to secure the right to participate in the Indian Premier League should be treated as revenue expenditure. It records that the ITAT had held the expenditure to be revenue in nature, and the Bombay High Court admitted the appeal on the framed substantial question of law. The operative point is the tax characterization of the franchise-fee outlay, with the issue left for appellate determination on the stated legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>