<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 2087 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469538</link>
    <description>Commission income from accommodation entry was estimated at 0.26% of turnover, as the higher 0.50% rate was found excessive on the facts. The assessee had admitted engaging in accommodation entry activity, and the director&#039;s statement under section 131 ed a margin of 0.10% to 0.15%. A comparable case with similar facts supported adoption of 0.26% as the appropriate commission rate. The estimate was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 11:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 2087 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469538</link>
      <description>Commission income from accommodation entry was estimated at 0.26% of turnover, as the higher 0.50% rate was found excessive on the facts. The assessee had admitted engaging in accommodation entry activity, and the director&#039;s statement under section 131 ed a margin of 0.10% to 0.15%. A comparable case with similar facts supported adoption of 0.26% as the appropriate commission rate. The estimate was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>