<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 140 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52329</link>
    <description>Telephone instruments notified under section 4A of the Central Excise Act were held to fall under the MRP-based valuation scheme where the package had to declare retail sale price under the Standards of Weights and Measures law and the Packaged Commodities Rules. Bulk supply to DOT/MTNL, retention of ownership by the department, or later rental use by subscribers did not by itself create a statutory exception or justify valuation under section 4. The majority also held that a Board circular cannot narrow the statutory reach of section 4A. The dissent considered the circular and an earlier Tribunal view sufficient to support section 4 valuation for bulk supplies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 140 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52329</link>
      <description>Telephone instruments notified under section 4A of the Central Excise Act were held to fall under the MRP-based valuation scheme where the package had to declare retail sale price under the Standards of Weights and Measures law and the Packaged Commodities Rules. Bulk supply to DOT/MTNL, retention of ownership by the department, or later rental use by subscribers did not by itself create a statutory exception or justify valuation under section 4. The majority also held that a Board circular cannot narrow the statutory reach of section 4A. The dissent considered the circular and an earlier Tribunal view sufficient to support section 4 valuation for bulk supplies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>