https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793684 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 should ordinarily not be used to seek directions affecting pending tribunal proceedings when an alternative statutory remedy is available. The petitioner sought early listing of a transfer application and a status quo order in ongoing insolvency proceedings, but had not first exhausted remedies before the tribunal or appellate forum; the transfer request was also brought late after participation in the proceedings. The High Court noted that special bench and vacation listing matters lie within the tribunal president's domain and that similar relief had been pursued in multiple forums. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, and the requested directions were refused, with costs. en-us Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:39:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793684 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 should ordinarily not be used to seek directions affecting pending tribunal proceedings when an alternative statutory remedy is available. The petitioner sought early listing of a transfer application and a status quo order in ongoing insolvency proceedings, but had not first exhausted remedies before the tribunal or appellate forum; the transfer request was also brought late after participation in the proceedings. The High Court noted that special bench and vacation listing matters lie within the tribunal president's domain and that similar relief had been pursued in multiple forums. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable, and the requested directions were refused, with costs. Case-Laws IBC Wed, 17 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793684