<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 137 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52326</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order that clubbed the clearances of two firms with common partners. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence of financial interdependence or shared operations between the firms. The show cause notice was deemed legally flawed, and the order was annulled, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 137 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52326</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order that clubbed the clearances of two firms with common partners. The Tribunal found insufficient evidence of financial interdependence or shared operations between the firms. The show cause notice was deemed legally flawed, and the order was annulled, granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52326</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>