<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1087 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793706</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Section 147 was held invalid where the original scrutiny assessment had already examined the disputed depreciation, goodwill, CSR deduction, unascertained liabilities, and additional depreciation claims, and no fresh tangible material emerged. Audit objections alone were treated as a change of opinion and not as jurisdictional material to reopen concluded proceedings. The Court also noted that the assessee&#039;s replies and disclosures had addressed these items during the original assessment, including the depreciation treatment for computers and computer software. The notice under Section 148 and the order rejecting objections were quashed, and the reassessment was held impermissible on all recorded grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:39:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1087 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793706</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Section 147 was held invalid where the original scrutiny assessment had already examined the disputed depreciation, goodwill, CSR deduction, unascertained liabilities, and additional depreciation claims, and no fresh tangible material emerged. Audit objections alone were treated as a change of opinion and not as jurisdictional material to reopen concluded proceedings. The Court also noted that the assessee&#039;s replies and disclosures had addressed these items during the original assessment, including the depreciation treatment for computers and computer software. The notice under Section 148 and the order rejecting objections were quashed, and the reassessment was held impermissible on all recorded grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>