https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793713 Writ petitions challenge a common adjudication order on the ground that proceedings were transferred from Delhi to Mumbai through a corrigendum without authority, and also allege inordinate delay and breach of procedural fairness causing prejudice. The Court considered these jurisdictional and fairness objections as requiring deeper examination and, pending further hearing, granted interim protection against coercive action on the basis of the impugned order. en-us Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:39:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793713 Writ petitions challenge a common adjudication order on the ground that proceedings were transferred from Delhi to Mumbai through a corrigendum without authority, and also allege inordinate delay and breach of procedural fairness causing prejudice. The Court considered these jurisdictional and fairness objections as requiring deeper examination and, pending further hearing, granted interim protection against coercive action on the basis of the impugned order. Case-Laws GST Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793713