<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1097 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793716</link>
    <description>Writ petition was not entertained on merits, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy instead. The court permitted filing of an appeal within two weeks, together with a delay condonation application and the required statutory pre-deposit. The operative effect was that relief was channelled to the alternate statutory forum rather than decided in writ jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 08:39:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1097 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793716</link>
      <description>Writ petition was not entertained on merits, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appellate remedy instead. The court permitted filing of an appeal within two weeks, together with a delay condonation application and the required statutory pre-deposit. The operative effect was that relief was channelled to the alternate statutory forum rather than decided in writ jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>