<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 121 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52323</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, allowing the conversion of free Shipping Bills to DFRC Shipping Bills. It found the Appeal maintainable under the Customs Act, noting compliance with Norms permitting Zirconium Silicate import. The Tribunal determined that proving forced filing of free Shipping Bills was unnecessary, and the Appellants provided sufficient evidence of Zirconium Silicate use in their exports.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 121 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52323</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, allowing the conversion of free Shipping Bills to DFRC Shipping Bills. It found the Appeal maintainable under the Customs Act, noting compliance with Norms permitting Zirconium Silicate import. The Tribunal determined that proving forced filing of free Shipping Bills was unnecessary, and the Appellants provided sufficient evidence of Zirconium Silicate use in their exports.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=52323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>