<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1835 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469533</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in the assessee&#039;s bank account during the demonetisation period were explained by agricultural income, past savings, low household expenditure and ownership of agricultural land. Land records supported cultivation, and the possibility of agricultural receipts and accumulated savings could not be excluded. Considering these surrounding circumstances, including the assessee&#039;s age, widowhood, absence of family support and agricultural background, the ITAT further moderated the addition. The addition, which had already been restricted by the first appellate authority, was reduced to 25% of the cash deposits and the balance was deleted, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 21:58:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1835 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469533</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in the assessee&#039;s bank account during the demonetisation period were explained by agricultural income, past savings, low household expenditure and ownership of agricultural land. Land records supported cultivation, and the possibility of agricultural receipts and accumulated savings could not be excluded. Considering these surrounding circumstances, including the assessee&#039;s age, widowhood, absence of family support and agricultural background, the ITAT further moderated the addition. The addition, which had already been restricted by the first appellate authority, was reduced to 25% of the cash deposits and the balance was deleted, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>