<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SC junks bizman&#039;s plea challenging legality of ED searches in TASMAC case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73460</link>
    <description>Challenge to the legality of Enforcement Directorate searches and seizure proceedings at a businessman&#039;s residence in a money-laundering probe linked to TASMAC. The plea sought quashing of searches conducted on multiple dates, but the High Court had declined to examine their validity at that stage. The Supreme Court upheld that approach and did not entertain the challenge to the searches.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 14:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 14:31:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SC junks bizman&#039;s plea challenging legality of ED searches in TASMAC case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73460</link>
      <description>Challenge to the legality of Enforcement Directorate searches and seizure proceedings at a businessman&#039;s residence in a money-laundering probe linked to TASMAC. The plea sought quashing of searches conducted on multiple dates, but the High Court had declined to examine their validity at that stage. The Supreme Court upheld that approach and did not entertain the challenge to the searches.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 14:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=73460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>