<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1534 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469523</link>
    <description>Criminal prosecution may be quashed under Section 482 CrPC where the accused has already been exonerated on merits in disciplinary proceedings based on the same facts and substantially identical allegations. The Delhi HC noted that, although disciplinary action and criminal proceedings are generally independent, continuation of a criminal case can amount to abuse of process when the inquiry report, affirmed by the disciplinary authority, finds the charges of negligence and manipulation not proved on merits. The governing test is whether the allegations and evidence are the same and the exoneration is substantive rather than technical; in that setting, the stricter criminal standard does not justify relitigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 13:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1534 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469523</link>
      <description>Criminal prosecution may be quashed under Section 482 CrPC where the accused has already been exonerated on merits in disciplinary proceedings based on the same facts and substantially identical allegations. The Delhi HC noted that, although disciplinary action and criminal proceedings are generally independent, continuation of a criminal case can amount to abuse of process when the inquiry report, affirmed by the disciplinary authority, finds the charges of negligence and manipulation not proved on merits. The governing test is whether the allegations and evidence are the same and the exoneration is substantive rather than technical; in that setting, the stricter criminal standard does not justify relitigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>