<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1592 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469520</link>
    <description>Banking-company tax treatment covers deletion of expenditure disallowance where no actual expenditure related to exempt income, and taxation of income-tax refund interest on accrual under the mercantile system, subject to relief from double taxation. MAT was treated as inapplicable on the stated facts. Bad debts written off for non-rural advances were not subject to the rural-advance proviso, while the provision for bad debts was not restricted to incremental advances. Depreciation on held-to-maturity securities was allowable as banking stock-in-trade. Payment characterised as a banking regulatory penalty remained deductible on the applicable precedent, and the special-reserve deduction was allowed where statutory conditions were met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 10:56:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1592 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469520</link>
      <description>Banking-company tax treatment covers deletion of expenditure disallowance where no actual expenditure related to exempt income, and taxation of income-tax refund interest on accrual under the mercantile system, subject to relief from double taxation. MAT was treated as inapplicable on the stated facts. Bad debts written off for non-rural advances were not subject to the rural-advance proviso, while the provision for bad debts was not restricted to incremental advances. Depreciation on held-to-maturity securities was allowable as banking stock-in-trade. Payment characterised as a banking regulatory penalty remained deductible on the applicable precedent, and the special-reserve deduction was allowed where statutory conditions were met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>