<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1003 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793622</link>
    <description>For an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, prosecution lies against the drawer and signatory of the cheque, because the cheque must be drawn by the person sought to be prosecuted on an account maintained by that person. Section 141 provides limited vicarious liability for offences by companies and similar juristic entities, but it cannot be extended to two private individuals merely because they maintain a joint account or share a joint debt. A non-signatory joint account holder without a specific role could not be proceeded against under Section 138, and the summoning order was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:04:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1003 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793622</link>
      <description>For an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, prosecution lies against the drawer and signatory of the cheque, because the cheque must be drawn by the person sought to be prosecuted on an account maintained by that person. Section 141 provides limited vicarious liability for offences by companies and similar juristic entities, but it cannot be extended to two private individuals merely because they maintain a joint account or share a joint debt. A non-signatory joint account holder without a specific role could not be proceeded against under Section 138, and the summoning order was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>