https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793630 The article discusses denial of Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme benefit on the basis of a substantially false declaration, treatment of payments and CENVAT credit under the Scheme, and a later service tax demand relating to flex printing, fixing and in-shop branding. The CESTAT Kolkata set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing consideration of the appellant's records and issuance of a speaking order; no final decision was reached on the disputed issues. en-us Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:04:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793630 The article discusses denial of Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme benefit on the basis of a substantially false declaration, treatment of payments and CENVAT credit under the Scheme, and a later service tax demand relating to flex printing, fixing and in-shop branding. The CESTAT Kolkata set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing consideration of the appellant's records and issuance of a speaking order; no final decision was reached on the disputed issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793630