<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 1046 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793665</link>
    <description>A promissory note carries the statutory presumption of consideration under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that presumption stands where the defendant offers no specific denial, evidence, or cross-examination to rebut execution or loan advance. Failure to produce income-tax returns or other proof of financial capacity, by itself, does not justify an adverse inference unless the court first seeks clarification through the Evidence Act and CPC procedures. A possible breach of Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not make the loan unenforceable or defeat recovery. The note-holder&#039;s claim, therefore, remained proved on the materials discussed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:04:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 1046 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793665</link>
      <description>A promissory note carries the statutory presumption of consideration under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that presumption stands where the defendant offers no specific denial, evidence, or cross-examination to rebut execution or loan advance. Failure to produce income-tax returns or other proof of financial capacity, by itself, does not justify an adverse inference unless the court first seeks clarification through the Evidence Act and CPC procedures. A possible breach of Section 269SS of the Income-tax Act, 1961 does not make the loan unenforceable or defeat recovery. The note-holder&#039;s claim, therefore, remained proved on the materials discussed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>