<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reasonable period for FEMA show-cause notices remains fact-specific; merits must be pursued through statutory remedies.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100943</link>
    <description>In review proceedings concerning FEMA and TISPRO allegations, the HC reiterated that, where no limitation period is prescribed, whether a show-cause notice was issued within a reasonable period is fact-specific and should be urged before the adjudicating authority, with statutory appellate remedies remaining available under FEMA. It refused to treat prior case law on reassessment or statutory delay as a universal bar to penal proceedings, and held that issues about RBI notification timing, the FDI policy, exit from the company, and the definition of &quot;Group Company&quot; were merits-based and partly fact-disputed. Finding no error apparent in the earlier writ order, the review applications were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:04:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reasonable period for FEMA show-cause notices remains fact-specific; merits must be pursued through statutory remedies.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100943</link>
      <description>In review proceedings concerning FEMA and TISPRO allegations, the HC reiterated that, where no limitation period is prescribed, whether a show-cause notice was issued within a reasonable period is fact-specific and should be urged before the adjudicating authority, with statutory appellate remedies remaining available under FEMA. It refused to treat prior case law on reassessment or statutory delay as a universal bar to penal proceedings, and held that issues about RBI notification timing, the FDI policy, exit from the company, and the definition of &quot;Group Company&quot; were merits-based and partly fact-disputed. Finding no error apparent in the earlier writ order, the review applications were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 08:04:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=100943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>