<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1741 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469502</link>
    <description>Liquidated damages and penal charges recovered from vendors for delayed delivery were held not to constitute consideration for any taxable service. The Tribunal treated such recoveries as compensatory amounts for breach of contract, not payment for activity carried out for another or for tolerating breach merely because the contract contained a penal clause. Relying on the settled position and the Board circular, it held that service tax was not leviable on the amounts recovered, and the connected demand of interest, late fee and penalties also could not survive. The revenue appeal was dismissed and the relief granted to the assessee was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1741 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469502</link>
      <description>Liquidated damages and penal charges recovered from vendors for delayed delivery were held not to constitute consideration for any taxable service. The Tribunal treated such recoveries as compensatory amounts for breach of contract, not payment for activity carried out for another or for tolerating breach merely because the contract contained a penal clause. Relying on the settled position and the Board circular, it held that service tax was not leviable on the amounts recovered, and the connected demand of interest, late fee and penalties also could not survive. The revenue appeal was dismissed and the relief granted to the assessee was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>