<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1823 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469511</link>
    <description>Where assessment was completed ex parte and relevant material had not been considered earlier, additional evidence could be admitted to ensure adjudication on a proper factual basis. The Tribunal held that the documents should first be examined by the CIT(A), and the matter was restored for fresh decision after giving the assessee due opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1823 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469511</link>
      <description>Where assessment was completed ex parte and relevant material had not been considered earlier, additional evidence could be admitted to ensure adjudication on a proper factual basis. The Tribunal held that the documents should first be examined by the CIT(A), and the matter was restored for fresh decision after giving the assessee due opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>