<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1826 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469514</link>
    <description>Offshore supply receipts were held not sustainable for attribution to an Indian installation PE where the assessee showed FOB supply, passage of title and risk outside India, separate supply and installation orders, and receipt of consideration abroad; the Tribunal found the core facts were not properly verified and remitted the issue for fresh examination. A revised expense claim, including revised audit report and additional supervision fee expenditure, was also disallowed without adequate factual verification or consideration of the remand report, so that assessment aspect was similarly set aside for de novo consideration. Interest grounds remained consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1826 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469514</link>
      <description>Offshore supply receipts were held not sustainable for attribution to an Indian installation PE where the assessee showed FOB supply, passage of title and risk outside India, separate supply and installation orders, and receipt of consideration abroad; the Tribunal found the core facts were not properly verified and remitted the issue for fresh examination. A revised expense claim, including revised audit report and additional supervision fee expenditure, was also disallowed without adequate factual verification or consideration of the remand report, so that assessment aspect was similarly set aside for de novo consideration. Interest grounds remained consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>