<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (1) TMI 1833 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469518</link>
    <description>Notice under Section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act was treated as required on the admitted legal position relied on in the writ proceedings, and the Revenue did not dispute that position. In that context, the intra-court challenge did not call for further adjudication on merits. The appeal was disposed of, while liberty was reserved to the Revenue to pursue other proceedings in accordance with law and all contentions were kept open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (1) TMI 1833 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469518</link>
      <description>Notice under Section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act was treated as required on the admitted legal position relied on in the writ proceedings, and the Revenue did not dispute that position. In that context, the intra-court challenge did not call for further adjudication on merits. The appeal was disposed of, while liberty was reserved to the Revenue to pursue other proceedings in accordance with law and all contentions were kept open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=469518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>