<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (6) TMI 958 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793577</link>
    <description>Retail sale price-based CVD assessment was impermissible for imported projectors brought in for installation on a lease or right-to-use basis, because the goods were not intended for retail sale; duty had to be assessed on transaction value. Notional freight at 20% of FOB value could not be substituted where actual freight was available on record, and the same principle applied to insurance: a deemed 1.125% value could not override actual insurance charges. Bills of Entry were also liable to amendment under section 149 on the basis of contemporaneous documents supporting the import valuation. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:24:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=907747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (6) TMI 958 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793577</link>
      <description>Retail sale price-based CVD assessment was impermissible for imported projectors brought in for installation on a lease or right-to-use basis, because the goods were not intended for retail sale; duty had to be assessed on transaction value. Notional freight at 20% of FOB value could not be substituted where actual freight was available on record, and the same principle applied to insurance: a deemed 1.125% value could not override actual insurance charges. Bills of Entry were also liable to amendment under section 149 on the basis of contemporaneous documents supporting the import valuation. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=793577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>